Dream Lifter 747 Large Cargo Freighter
#41
Posted 13 February 2008 - 07:56 PM
its not like PAX think as theyre walking to their plane.
"my goodness thats an ugly plane were about to board"
Regards
Matty
#42 LarryTM (Unregistered)
Posted 13 February 2008 - 10:03 PM
tankboy747, on Feb 13 2008, 05:56 PM, said:
its not like PAX think as theyre walking to their plane.
"my goodness thats an ugly plane were about to board"
Regards
Matty
But B747 was planed as a military cargo transporter. Boeing's project lost competition and they remodeled it to a passanger version.
Who knows. Maybe in future Boeing changes DreamLifter into passanger version of 747-900 3-decker to compete with Airbus A380?
#43
Posted 14 February 2008 - 07:29 PM
Redwood.839, on Feb 13 2008, 09:44 AM, said:
seahawks7757, on Feb 13 2008, 12:14 AM, said:
The Airbus Beluga has being around longer and serving it's job for quite a while, It wasn't make to look pretty, Neither Do I doubt Boeing made this to be pretty, they're both serving the job , and they're doing fine, No reason to even considerer them both ugly or cute.
Before the introduction of Beluga, every Airbus was carried by Boeing.
#44
Posted 15 February 2008 - 09:02 AM
It would be very cool to see the posky house colours on this, maby a cargo version of the house paint? Also, I would LOVE to be able to paint this, no matter how bad my painting skills are, so a paint kit would be on my wish list

If quizzes are quizical, what are tests?| Pentax K200D+ SMC Pentax 18-250mm, Tokina 70-210mm, Cosina 24mm, A 35-70mm. Last 3 inhereted.
#45
Posted 15 February 2008 - 07:51 PM
But B747 was planed as a military cargo transporter. Boeing's project lost competition and they remodeled it to a passanger version.
Who knows. Maybe in future Boeing changes DreamLifter into passanger version of 747-900 3-decker to compete with Airbus A380?
[/quote]
Not true- the 747 was designed as a civil transport from the beginning. The Boeing's work on the CX-HLX study program( that resulted in Lockheed's C-5) contributed in part to the 747-namely engines, but the 747 is not a derivative of the proposed CX-HLX.
#47
Posted 16 February 2008 - 04:12 PM
Adam
#48
Posted 16 February 2008 - 08:59 PM
http://i31.photobucket.com/albums/c361/air...ar_Meyer_04.jpg
#50 Plainplane (Unregistered)
Posted 16 February 2008 - 10:11 PM
jetblue3000, on Feb 16 2008, 08:59 PM, said:
http://i31.photobucket.com/albums/c361/air...ar_Meyer_04.jpg
Plainplane
#51
Posted 16 February 2008 - 10:39 PM
Plainplane, on Feb 16 2008, 08:11 PM, said:
jetblue3000, on Feb 16 2008, 08:59 PM, said:
http://i31.photobucket.com/albums/c361/air...ar_Meyer_04.jpg
Plainplane
Yep, but it need some ketchup. Great Model
Tech2008
#53
Posted 17 February 2008 - 06:34 AM
#54
Posted 17 February 2008 - 07:17 AM
YoSuKe, on Feb 13 2008, 01:12 AM, said:
Is the KC767 one of that?
http://www.projectopensky.com/The_Project_..._and_Beyond.pdf
#55
Posted 17 February 2008 - 10:48 AM
A few of the designers have already hinted at a few projects... we just haven't announced anything officially yet..
#56 T-Pilot (Unregistered)
Posted 19 February 2008 - 02:40 PM
#57 MD11Pilot (Unregistered)
Posted 19 February 2008 - 06:32 PM
Posky's own forum rules state: In an effort to make these forums a friendly enviroment POSKY will not tolerate disruptive, abusive, or otherwise objectional behavior or material in our forums
Now, maybe its just me, but calling someone new to the hobby "stupid" because they don't know any better is certainly what I would call abusive and objectional. Wasn't there a time when each and every one of us was a "stupid noob"?
#58
Posted 19 February 2008 - 07:16 PM
located here: http://forum.project...showtopic=30185
Check out my 787 Blog- http://seahawks7757.blogspot.com/
Also my always updated flickr page- http://www.flickr.co...s/13497349@N04/
#59
Posted 19 February 2008 - 07:27 PM

#60 MD11Pilot (Unregistered)
Posted 19 February 2008 - 07:27 PM
seahawks7757, on Feb 20 2008, 04:16 AM, said:
located here: http://forum.project...showtopic=30185
No, Yosuke wrote that on the first page of this thread, so this is where I responded. Maybe it also belongs in the other thread, but I dont recall seeing anyone calling newbies "stupid" in that thread. They may have implied it, but I dont think anyone actually said it.

Help



























